Animal Research Context: Scaling from Rodents Preclinical studies with Dihexa and angiotensin IV analogues employed doses that ranged considerably depending on species, route, and outcome measured: Intravenous (IV) Administration Animal studies using intravenous dosing (which bypasses absorption barriers and achieves near-complete bioavailability) reported cognitive and neuroprotective effects at: 0.1 to 2.0 mg/kg in rodent studies (McCoy et al., 2013) Doses at the higher end of this range (12 mg/kg IV) produced robust behavioral effects For a 70 kg human, equivalent to 70140 mg total IV dose (crude extrapolation) However, direct extrapolation from rodents to humans is unreliable due to differences in metabolism, brain penetration, and receptor sensitivity Intraperitoneal (IP) Administration IP dosing (injection into the abdominal cavity, with slower absorption than IV) showed effects at: Up to 10 mg/kg in some studies Lower bioavailability than IV, requiring higher nominal doses for similar effects This route is not practical for human use Why Rodent Dosing Doesn't Directly Translate Rodent pharmacokinetics differ substantially from humans

A lower DAR value may reduce the anti-tumor efficacy, while a higher DAR may affect the structure, stability, and antigen binding ability of the antibody, thereby leading to loss of activity
Curious to hear you #CPG #TheBetterPeer #CPGConsulting #WhatIsChanging #FoodAndBeverage #ConsumerGoods #Innovation #BrandStrategy #GLP1 Richard LimRichard Lim is an Influencer Retail Economist | Shaping the Retail Debate Through Proprietary Research & Insight | CEO & Founder, Retail Economics 38,199 followers GLP-1 weight loss drugs have shifted from a fringe health topic to a boardroom conversation, and the pace at which they are moving into the mainstream is making food and hospitality executives sit up
L-, L-